How do you solve this paradox? Solving this problem can be difficult. Sometimes really motivating goals and a tight schedule can leave us feeling burnt out and drained. So how can we achieve a balance between work and leisure that will allow you to get a maximum amount of work done without feeling burnt out or drained? At the same time, how can we really get the most out of our leisure time without being completely unproductive and lazy? The first step to this is in improving the quality of the activities we currently spend for both work and leisure. By increasing the quality of these activities, we can get a lot more out of them using less time.
I discussed the essence of this philosophy in this article about doing what is important. Many of our activities are simply not important in terms of either being productive, or allowing us to enjoy ourselves. Too many people watch television shows they have little interest in. Spending some time to really connect with what is important in any situation will allow us to rid ourselves of these time wasters and put it back into things that are truly enjoyable or productive or both! The second issue to solving this problem is energy.
Certain tasks require a lot of our focus and energy, usually these tasks are also the same tasks we find most enjoyable or are the most productive. By taking steps to increase our energy levels, through proper diet and exercise, it is easier to focus on these tasks rather than waste time.
This issue of energy levels often extends to work. Whenever I am working hard on a programming problem, it can be easy to feel temporarily drained or low on mental energy. A lot of other programmers I know would take this as a sign that they need a break, so they decide to browse the web or check their e-mail inbox.
When you are low on energy because you have spent too long focusing on a tough problem, take a break, but take a real break. Whenever I need to recharge, I take off five or ten minutes and grab a piece of fruit. I then eat the piece of fruit, sit back with my eyes closed and take some deep breaths.
This type of break allows you to regain some energy and clear your mind so you can get back to work. Taking a break by browsing the web or checking your e-mail only wastes time and distracts you. By working intelligently, taking actual breaks when you need them instead of just distractions, it will be easier to cut down on the amount of time you spend working. This is because you will be working when you need to work. By cutting down the amount you work, you can increase the amount of time you have to enjoy yourself.
The third issue to resolve is in separating your work and leisure time. When you have really motivating goals or a project that make constant demands of your time, it is easy to sacrifice leisure time to continue working.
acefanodewud.cf: The Value of Time and Leisure in a World of Work ( ): Mitchell R. Haney, David A. Kline, Kevin Aho, Robert Audi, Peter A. French. This book is concerned with how we should think and act in our work, leisure activities, and time utilization in order to achieve flourishing lives. The scope papers.
Without it, we are all at the end of electronic leashes, and a major backlash will be much more likely. Notice that all cars have cup holders now; the extreme technology for such exotic things existed in , only no one wanted them! We drank coffee at home or in a cafe or restaurant!
Of course, the people invited to participate in the Future of the Internet III survey are well-informed technology-savvy knowledge workers, so many are living hyperconnected lives. They are not embracing this world I live in, and when I think about it, I have always been this way, long before technology ever came to dominate my life, when I lived as deeply inside books and personal projects that consumed my life then, just as they do now.
I bet if a person had access to a database of Davos World Economic Forum attendees over the last years, one would see a pattern of greater diversity, greater inclusion of people more removed from seats of power, but still connected and influential in part because of their significance in the Social OS that is growing like a social commons of metadata about our relationships, our expertise, our causes and passions.
Staying connected and informed is the security blanket that people demand. While those who fear it say it will cause stress-related illnesses, those who welcome it say the flexibility it offers may improve mental health. This does not mean that private time disappears. It defines who they are. The blending of personal and professional existence will be heightened by the Internet connections.
Some respondents predicted that the future workforce will prefer a blur of work and personal life. Where we seek ideas and thought, there is no schedule. Many people see hyperconnectivy as a threat.
The vast majority of respondents who wrote elaborations equated hyperconnectivity with more work, not more play. Those who agreed with the scenario and saw it as a net-positive tended to be people who also noted they enjoy their work lives and find connection to be valuable. Those who predict that work will impinge on personal time primarily perceived employers as profit-oriented, not people-oriented. Our employers will gain even more control over work-time discipline and over our lives and will be able to force even more productive working hours from us.
Our lives will in fact be increasingly controlled by those who provide us with the devices that will have become increasingly necessary for us in both our work and personal lives as well as those who own and control the networks and network sites that we use and visit. Concern over surveillance was also the central concept in the elaboration from Steve Sawyer , an associate professor in the college of information sciences and technology at Penn State University. In his scenario: This dystopia challenges the concept of white-collar work, and unionism is increasingly an issue. But, for example, in Europe and Scandinavia, there is considerable resistance to what is seen as the American model of working more and more and having less and less of a life.
An alternative scenario is to see the well-connected knowledge worker described here as simply a drone in the Borg hive: Upper-managers who keep their Blackberries and Treos by their side for the 4: Those on the outside who enjoy at least an occasional freedom from the Net would see such a drone as a slave, not as a free human being. Many who expect the future depicted in the scenario commented that social adjustments will be made to deal with the new realities. A number of survey participants suggested that the nature of work is going to change for the positive.
Rather, they value, greatly—their own personal, non-work time and space. With the accelerated pace of everyday life, the importance and value of rest, relaxation, renewal, and diversion from the work world…will only become greater. Most of the talk about this right now is focused on how this will result in a loss of personal time: But the other side is just as important, and shows how this likely will balance. The focus will be on accomplishing a task, not logging hours. This will make time more flexible for employees, and will allow sufficient management by employers who switch to compensation plans based on work accomplished rather than time spent.
This will be a radical new model of employment, but it will happen. Ivor Tossell , blogging journalist and technology columnist for the Toronto Globe and Mail, notes that modern tools are just evolving to fit the evolution of human desires. Technology will not drive this change, but it will enable it. Some respondents looked ahead and imagined how human systems might change as hyperconnectivity becomes more prevalent between now and , with its positives and negatives.
Children know that learning can take place, anytime, anywhere, and in multiple modalities. Yet we only acknowledge or seem to respect the learning that takes place in a top-down, time-dependent, school system. I first said this 30 years ago, but it becomes more ubiquitous in the future.